Keep Good Parts Running, Even When Your Process Changes

Request an Autonomous Process Control Demo
youtube placeholder image

Your Machine May Look Stable. Your Parts May Not Be.

Machine data is important, but it does not always tell the full story of what is happening inside the mold. Screw position, fill time, transfer position, and injection pressure can repeat while cavity conditions still change.

Autonomous Process Control gives CoPilot a deeper level of process influence by connecting machine-side access with in-mold feedback. That means CoPilot can do more than identify variation — it can help control the process around the conditions that actually produce good parts.

What the machine can tell youWhat CoPilot can help control
Whether screw position repeatedWhether the cavity filled the same way
Whether fill time stayed consistentWhether pressure developed correctly in the mold
Whether transfer happened at the same pointWhether the part was packed under the right conditions
Whether the machine pressure stayed within rangeWhether pressure at the part stayed aligned with the good-part process
Whether settings stayed the sameWhether the process stayed connected to part quality
Sense what matters

CoPilot uses machine and in-mold data to understand what is happening during fill and pack.

Understand process variation

The system tracks whether the process is staying aligned with the established process fingerprint.

Adjust to maintain quality

CoPilot helps influence the machine in real time to maintain the conditions that produce good parts.

Autonomy Is Only as Good as the Data Behind It

Autonomous control depends on the quality of the data driving the decision. Machine data can tell you what the press tried to do. Cavity pressure tells you what the plastic experienced inside the mold. That difference matters when the goal is to control the process around the part, not just around machine settings.

  • Machine data is useful — but incomplete. It cannot fully account for what happens downstream of the nozzle.
  • Cavity pressure is closer to quality. It shows fill, pack, gate freeze, pressure decay, and part-forming behavior.
  • Better data enables better control. Autonomous systems that use in-mold data can respond to real process changes instead of inferring them indirectly.

Built for the Problems That Interrupt Production

Stable Part Quality

Hidden Variation

Maintain a more consistent part-forming process as conditions change, using data from inside the mold where quality is actually created.

Machine settings can look stable while in-mold conditions shift. Without the right feedback, variation may not show up until it becomes scrap, rework, or a quality escape.

Scalable Expertise

Skilled Labor Gaps

Capture expert process knowledge and apply it consistently across shifts, cells, and production teams.

When critical process knowledge lives only with experienced technicians, performance can vary by shift, operator availability, and troubleshooting bandwidth.

Less Downtime

Costly Interruptions

Keep machines running good parts longer by helping the process respond before variation leads to stops, restarts, or lost production time.

Stuck parts, short shots, quality checks, and restarts can break cycle, consume labor, create startup scrap, and delay production.

More Material Flexibility

Material Uncertainty

Support a wider range of materials, alternate lots, recycled content, or wider-spec resins while maintaining a stable process target.

Material changes can alter viscosity, pressure requirements, fill behavior, and part consistency. Without adaptive control, lower-cost or alternative materials can add risk.

Proven Direction. New Level of Control.

RJG has been moving toward autonomous process control for decades through cavity pressure sensing, DECOUPLED MOLDING®, process monitoring, and CoPilot. The new Autonomous Process Control option builds on that foundation by expanding control beyond monitoring and alarm limits into active process adjustment.

These examples point to the larger goal: capturing expert molding decisions in a repeatable control strategy that can be applied safely and consistently in production.

Material variation example

11

%

viscosity change

Downtime example

2

downtime events

Extreme material-change example

1

Δ

melt flow change

*Application results vary by mold, machine, material, and sensor strategy.

Where Autonomous Process Control Can Help Most

Material variation
High-scrap or defect-prone parts
Operator-dependent processes
High-value uptime applications

A Practical Path Toward Autonomous Molding

Five-step roadmap

1: Confirm sensor strategy

2: Evaluate the process

3: Establish the process

4: Enable CoPilot control logic

5: Validate and optimize

Choose cavity pressure sensor locations based on what needs to be controlled or verified.

Identify the part, material, quality risks, and process variables that cause instability.

Define the in-mold conditions that produce good parts and create the reference for repeatable performance.

Use CoPilot to monitor the process and respond in real time within defined control limits.

Review performance, refine the control strategy, and expand where autonomous control creates value.

Ready to See if Your Process Is a Fit?

Autonomous Process Control is designed for molders ready to move beyond process monitoring and toward embedded molding intelligence. Tell us about your process, material challenges, or current CoPilot setup, and RJG can help evaluate whether your application is ready for autonomous control.

Is Autonomous Process Control available for my current CoPilot system?
Autonomous Process Control is being developed as an advanced CoPilot capability. Availability and compatibility should be confirmed with RJG based on your system, machine, and application.
Do I need cavity pressure sensors?
For true autonomous process control, sensor strategy is critical. RJG’s materials emphasize that machine input data alone is not enough because too many variables occur downstream of the nozzle.
What does it control?
The new Autonomous Process Control direction is focused on using real-time data to help maintain the process during filling and packing, with the broader goal of moving toward more complete process maintenance over time.
Is this only for advanced molders?
No. The value is strongest where variation is expensive: material changes, quality issues, limited technician availability, difficult tools, or high-value uptime applications.
Can this help with recycled or lower-cost materials?
That is one of the strongest value angles. RJG materials point to wider material flexibility, recycled content, and alternate resin lots as important use cases for in-mold control and autonomous process control.